WHITES SHOULD REJECT THE FALSE IDEA THAT HITLER AND THE NAZIS WERE EVIL by H. Millard © 2017 |
||||
Ask yourself this Whitey: Wouldn't Whites be better off today if Hitler and the Nazis had won WWII? Answer the above question AS a White--that is, for you personally and for your own White family--and not in universal terms or about what is good for lumpen humanity or other kinds of humans. I emphasize the point about answering personally AS a White because when asked questions about such things, too many Whites are conditioned to answer in universal terms and they'll babble some socially acceptable (but wrong) answer about how Hitler and the Nazis killed so many (lumpen) humans or various non-White peoples and were just plain evil. When it is pointed out that war was forced on Hitler and he was defending WHITE people and WHITE interests, they try to deny this very real truth and revert to universalist clichés and usually spout off with the expected anti-White bromides disguised as anti-Hitler and anti-Nazi nonsense that has been force fed them for years. In reality, if you are against what Hitler and the Nazis really stood for, then you are against Whites and our survival, expansion and evolution along a White trajectory. Or more simply, you are against Whites and your own best interests. And, if you are against Whites and your own best interests one has to ask if you are just stupid or just a neurotic self-hater? The first law of nature that applies to all organisms is self-preservation, which really means preserving your genome (aka your DNA code). Only those who are insane don't work for their own preservation. Frankly, when I hear some brainwashed Whites spout off universal nonsense about humanity I immediately get a cartoon picture in my mind about sheep saying such nonsense about wolves in their midst who are harmful to sheep, but who the sheep have been conditioned to believe are just like themselves. "Why, sheep and wolves all bleed red blood and that means we are the same." Whites need to deprogram ourselves from harmful universalist thinking and we need to start using more particularistic thinking that will have us looking out for ourselves. This means that what is good for Whites generally is good for each of us as White individuals and for our White families. The easiest way of saying and thinking this is that we need to ask of everything: Is this good for Whites? To be clear, non-Whites and their business and their fates are not our White business unless they pose a danger to us. We must remain separate from them and even try to be completely isolated from them if we can. We must not mix their interests with our interests and we must not interfere in their affairs; instead we must be indifferent to them as we are indifferent to various other organisms that are not our kind. We must not be near their DNA. This doesn't mean that we must be impolite, hateful or cruel, but it does mean that we must only look out for ourselves and let other kinds look out for their kind. This is what nature (or God) has set up as part of the natural way of things. Being a good, just and compassionate White person means, in part, to mind your own White business and leave other kinds alone to their own business. Related to the above questions about Hitler and the Nazis are questions about racial diversity. If asked their opinions about racial diversity, too many Whites will give you the company line that racial diversity is wonderful. They will often couch this in some sort of universal terms or will say that racial diversity is great because it has helped Blacks or brings people together, or some variations of these. But, if you persist and ask them to tell you how diversity is good for themselves and their White families, they can't give you any sort of rational answer. The reason for this is that racial diversity is not good for Whites and it is actually one of the major dangers we face for our continued survival as Whites. Had the Nazis won the war would we now see our formerly all White lands being invaded by millions of non-Whites who are causing our genocide both by directly killing us and also by miscegenating with us and turning our White genome non-White? Of course not. Whites would be much better off today had the Nazis won. And, remember, the Nazis were our White brothers, sisters and cousins. They were not alien to our White kind and they wanted to prevent evil miscegenation and the destruction of the White genome and they also wanted to improve it. So, what did many brainwashed non-German Whites do back then? They went to kill their White brothers, sisters and cousins while siding with non-Whites and non-White interests. They took too short a view of existence instead of using their brains to realize that it was not and never is in their best interests to help non-Whites against Whites. They were like sheep who fight other sheep for the benefit of wolves. Awakened Whites understand the above and know it's true because awakened Whites understand some of the basics of nature and evolution. And, among these basics is the fact that all organisms must struggle to survive and exist and the greatest enemy for the continued existence of any particular kind of organism is usually similar organisms that can breed with them and contaminate their genome and thus cause them not to be as they are and to be replaced. And, that is genocide and extinction. Here, again, are the three most important quotes for Whites: 1. "[T]he varieties of mankind are so different that similar differences found in any other animals would warrant their classification in different species, if not in different genera." --Charles Darwin 2. "Living organisms must necessarily compete, for food, for mates and for living space, especially with other members of their own species [i.e. those they can breed with]. They must avoid predators and other dangers. For all these various reasons, some will leave more offspring than others, and it is the genetic characteristics of such preferred replicators which will be passed on preferentially to succeeding generations. This is the essence of natural selection." -- Francis Crick (Nobel laureate and co-discoverer of the shape of DNA) Emphasis added. 3. “Man is something that shall be overcome.Man is a rope,tied between beast and overman - a rope over an abyss.What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end.”-- Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra |
THREE BOOKS BY HARD TO PIGEONHOLE H. MILLARD All three books are now listed on Amazon.com. The lefties at the OC WEEKLY said Millard is one of OC's most frightening people. "Millard is an important writer" New Nation News "I consider H. Millard one of the most brilliant writers and analysts |
Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion |
ROAMING THE WASTELANDS |
THE OUTSIDER - (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) |
Views expressed by guest columnists, reporters and external links not necessarily those of the editor of New Nation News but hopefully of some interest |